Tuesday, 6 August 2013

"Tolerant" policing in the New Britain

While the British police and judicial system are all-too-keen to clamp down on racism and speeding, dishing out long jail sentences (when the culprits are white), it seems they are somewhat more laissez-faire, when the perpetrators are culture enrichers... The two latest examples are from 2 different extremes of modern Britain - an immigrant ghetto in Birmingham, and one of the wealthiest streets in London. First, Mankini meets multi-kulti in Birmingham. From the Daily Mail:

  • Steven Ellis, 41, and Jason Hendry, 22, wanted to walk in Birmingham
  • Were hoping to raise money for dogs' home but were escorted by police
  • Locals attacked them and hurled abuse in Sparkbrook area of the city
  • Men claim police said they had caused offence to locals during Ramadan
  • Ellis's wife Victoria was called a 'dirty white s***' in front of her children
Two brothers in law who went on a sponsored walk wearing comedy mankinis had to be picked up by police - after they were pelted with stones and eggs by residents who told them 'this is a Muslim area' and demanded they leave.

Steven Ellis, 41, and Jason Hendry, 22, wanted to walk eight miles from Solihull to Birmingham city centre wearing the outfit featured in 2006 film Borat to raise money for Birmingham Dogs' Home.

But they ended up being escorted by officers after they were attacked as they passed through the Sparkbrook area of the city, claiming police said they had offended local Muslims during Ramadan.




There is more...

 And the reaction of the Police, to such blatant racism?

‘We called the police and they came straight away. I asked the police what they were going to do to help us but they just said it was because of sensitivities over an EDL (English Defence League) march and Ramadan...


...A West Midlands Police spokesman said: ‘Police were called to reports of tensions on Stratford Road in Sparkhill at around 2:50pm on July 20 due to a group of men wearing fancy dress whilst on a charity walk.
‘Officers attended and worked closely with those at the scene to resolve the situation peacefully in order to ensure no unnecessary or unintended upset was caused.
‘Police left the area around 25 minutes later and there were no further calls to the location.'

One can't help wondering the reaction, if it was white Britons giving similar abuse to Muslims... would they "leave the area 25 minutes later", with no arrests having been made?

The second incident concerns a motorcyclist on a wealthy London street doing a "wheelie"...

While there is no definitive proof that the culprit was a culture enricher, there are some clues:

Clue #1: A motorcyclist showing the bravado at the wheel beloved by Arabs
Clue #2: Skin complexion
Clue #3: An "unidentified man" in the news report
Clue #4: The police reaction "Police received a report of a motorcyclist riding erratically on Sloane Street at approximately 19:30 on August 3... Officers spoke to the man and no further action was taken and there were no arrests."

 The picture below shows police officers at the scene "speaking to" the man:




What would the reaction have been to such reckless motorcycling, if it had not been a case of culture-enricher-biker-meets-culture-enricher-policeman?

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

A picture that says a thousand words

Obama's foreign policy, and the US government's suggestions that Egyptian Copts don't join anti-government protests, rear their fruit...


This picture is from a Polish news website... but will it ever appear in the US or English-language mainstream media?

Sunday, 14 April 2013

Did Thatcher "destroy Britain's coalmines"?

That's what her detractors keep saying. And it's a big reason for the outpouring of hate and "happiness" since her death... So, how do her predecessors shape up?

Here's a graph of coal output and employment from 1950 to 2011, as a percentage of the figures in 1950...

 
Maggie Thatcher - destroying Britain's coalmines??

The source data, from the UK government data giving coal statistics since 1850, can be found here...

A deeper discussion on the data can also be found here...

What does it tell us? Well, there was certainly a decline in Maggie Thatcher's time. However, under both Wilson and Macmillan, it is clear that there was a much steeper decline. Under Harold Wilson in the 60s, 80% more miners lost their jobs each year. Yet how often do we hear that Wilson destroyed Britain's coal industry?

More positively, at the end of the Thatcher era, around 3/4 of coal was produced (of the figure in 1979), by around 1/4 of the miners. Which equates to around 3 times more coal produced, and hence 3 times higher productivity, per miner. 3 times less miners to do the same job, and be supported by the UK taxpayer... In any private industry, this would be hailed as a fantastic success... so why is there no acknowledgement of this in the case of evaluating Thatcher's reign as prime minister??

Friday, 22 March 2013

The solution for Israel - surrendering settlements, or developing technology?

Barack Obama gave today, in Jerusalem, what some of his fans have classified as a "vintage Obama" speech. High on elegant words, erudite, some may say inspirational - like some of his past speeches. And like those previous speeches, whether the outcome results in anything more than these words remains to be seen. He implied that the only feasible future for Israel was for an independent Israel and independent "Palestine" alongside each other. It would require surrendering the West Bank settlements and a return to the 1967 borders - however Obama suggested that if Israel surrendered these vital strategic positions and settlements, the Palestinians may respect the Jewish state, and its right to exist... This is because Israel can now trust Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas to be a "partner", and Obama's USA to be Israel's "greatest friend" that it can "count on". In short, he tried to persuade young Israelis that things that appear very improbable can actually happen.



Oil - the key for the USSR... and Israel?

Indeed - improbable things HAVE happened... The USSR fell only a couple of years after East German president Honecker described the Berlin Wall as being built to last "for the next thousand years". Why such a turn of events? In large part, the USSR's weakening power could be attributed to a drastic fall in the price of oil, on whose export it was dependent for its revenue. In the absence of income from oil, the Eastern Bloc nations resorted to increasing their debts.

Given that the Palestinians' and current US administration's respect for Israel is questionable to say the least, my opinion is that the solution proposed by Barack Obama is dangerous, possibly making the destruction of Israel that much easier for the Palestinians. Instead, only another drastic, and lasting, change in the price of oil will make it possible to guarantee Israel's long-term future. Oil being the reason why the West currently has to recognise the Arab world's many grievances and demands. It was a weapon used in 1973, when Arab countries launched an embargo on Western "allies of Israel" in the wake of the 1973 war. Possibly now, the oil Sheikhs are an unofficial source of funding for the "Palestinian cause" - including Qassams, as well as food and medicine. Dependence on oil is also why the EU in particular feels the need to be in the good books of Arab Gulf state rulers.

The Burj Khalifa - petrodollars helped to build it

Qassam rockets - petrodollars also helped to build them?

So how would a large decrease in the oil price change things? The UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other oil exporters, having made large investments, would be liable to face serious economic problems - quite possibly making Greece and Cyprus today look like oases of stability. It would mean less "benevolent funding" for Western universities, and takeovers of Western companies. It may even result in once-wealthy Gulf states requiring Western assistance in the form of bail-outs... As a result, if Western pressure were to be carefully applied following a lasting oil price decrease, could Arab states not be more inclined to recognise Israel's needs - and even possibly to accept some Palestinian immigrants?

A vastly bigger oil price = vastly more petrodollars!

 

Discovering America

There have already been occasions in the past when Islam held a stranglehold on the West. After the conquest of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottomans made Western trade with India increasingly more costly and difficult. Suffering under the trade restrictions, European Christians started to look for new solutions. Eventually, these included radical ideas to find entirely different trade routes to India, not encroaching on Muslim territory. The search for an alternative trade route was the reason for Christopher Columbus sailing West from Europe, as well as Vasco da Gama sailing South, four decades later. We all know what happened next...

Although the New World was discovered by accident, it was as a direct result of trade routes to India through newly-conquered Muslim lands becoming much less favourable. And a way to India via America was finally found after Ferdinand Magellan set sail around the world in 1519. Once again, we need to "discover America" - to find a way out of the stranglehold the Muslim world currently exerts on us.

Breaking the Muslims' stranglehold on Europe... in the style of Columbus and Vasco Da Gama



Increasing supply, decreasing demand

How can such a "Columbus moment" be achieved in the present day? The cause of the current stranglehold by the Islamic world - a high oil price - is due to a significantly higher demand than was previously the case - without as much of an increase in supply. Much of it due to new demand from China. Since oil is a globally-traded commodity, a decrease in demand from one country will exert an impact on the oil price in another country - even if no direct oil trade takes place between them. For example - if US oil consumption decreases, the price of oil sold by Indonesia will drop - even if the US buys no oil from Indonesia. This is because there is more surplus oil left in the original suppliers of the US, who can now also offer it to Indonesia's customers. The key, then, to reduce the oil price must be to reduce oil consumption - or increase oil supply - throughout the world...


The western world - bankrolling its own enemies...

Such an imbalance between supply and demand can be rectified using various means, including:
  • New technologies.
  • Drilling new oilfields.
  • Alternative means of travel.
  • Greater efficiency of vehicles.
  • Reducing travel.

Petrol from air

To drastically alter the oil supply and demand seems unlikely. Indeed, current trends suggest the opposite... However there are some glimmers of hope. These include:
  • Vast new shale oil reserves in the USA and Canada.
  • Efficient, non-car-dependent urban transportation systems (such as in the Brazilian city of Curitiba). 
  • A new method of creating fuel - "Petrol from air" - using water, Carbon Dioxide and electricity. A method developed by the "Air Fuel Synthesis" company in the UK.


A process for obtaining petrol from air and water - with no oil

Finding new oil reserves however seems only a temporary solution, and one which has been tried already - in the North Sea, whose oilfields Britain and Norway have to a large extent already depleted. Meanwhile, kerosene-powered aircraft appear to be the only answer for long-distance air travel (and gasoline-powered cars for much short-distance travel), and while efficiency is increasing, there are no quantum leaps to be made. 20% less fuel burn per passenger-kilometre is a feasible target for aircraft, with similar reductions expected for cars. With more Chinese and Indians travelling, and Western college graduates travelling around the world in ever greater numbers, reducing travel is not only impossible, but a vast increase in demand for travel appears inevitable. Therefore, new technology appears to be the most probable cause of any future radical downward shift in oil demand.

A new method of creating gasoline, or a gasoline equivalent, independently from oil - but instead with electricity from another source (at present - coal, gas, hydro, wind or nuclear fission. In the future - nuclear fusion?) - could result in a vast decrease in the demand for, and hence the price of, oil, and indirectly go a long way to securing Israel and the Western World's future... perhaps Israel's world-renowned scientists and technologists, residing in a country described by Obama as a "center for innovation", should focus on working on such solutions?

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

Britain gets tough on illegal immigrants - no, wait...

After years of millions of illegal immigrants arriving, by boat, trucks and aircraft, often carrying no documentation and launching fake asylum claims, Britain finally starts to get tough on them. Well, at least one of them...


Yes - Tommy Robinson, the leader of the English Defence League, was found guilty of travelling to the USA, while identifying himself using a friend's passport. This in order to stay for one day, to attend a rally in memory of the September 11 attacks, before heading back to Britain. Quite possibly the shortest voluntary stay for an illegal immigrant in the history of the USA.

Usually, the punishment for illegal immigrants, if any, is deportation - although Britain is known for rewarding them with large benefits - and when they're found guilty of holding false passports, the courts even allow them to retain their fraudulently-acquired flats. Not so for Tommy Robinson, however - for his troubles, he ended up getting a 10-month prison sentence. This, in Britain, is longer than the sentence for more than half of all burglars.

At the same time, the London rapper Dappy is in the process of being charged with three counts of assault, as well as affray, for an incident in which 2 girls were spat at, followed by 3 men sustaining serious facial injuries (one of whom had 9 teeth missing). Dappy is alleged to have committed both the spitting and the assaults...

It will be interesting to see what the British justice system regards as the more serious: causing serious facial injuries and lifelong damage, or entering another country illegally, for a period of one day, before returning.

But then, Dappy is no ordinary thug. In his own words, he said that the Guardian was his favourite newspaper. And in 2011, the Guardian was all-too-eager to repay him with a long interview, giving him some much-needed free publicity... Will we see them give similar red-carpet treatment to someone else falling foul of the law - Tommy Robinson? I won't hold my breath...